Abstract
I
recently had the opportunity to visit a very relaxing and beautiful day
spa during the middle-of-the-day break from the sessions at a Keystone
meeting. I was having a very tranquil and restorative day, when I went
in for my final treatment — a facial. The very chipper and cheerful
esthetician began examining my skin and applying various creams, when I
then heard her say something that nearly ruined my experience: she
claimed that the topical treatment she was about to apply would, in her
words, “cleanse my liver.”
As
a scientist, I know better. The bulk of the over-the-counter potions
that day spas use are harmless and are meant to cleanse the skin and
increase transient moisture retention, and to cleanse anything more than
my skin seemed a mighty claim. So I decided to embark on a difficult
assignment for the sake of the JCI readership: to determine
whether a facial or other topical treatments are worthwhile investments
to keep skin healthy and wrinkle free. And to see whether or not it is
even possible for a topical treatment to cleanse the liver. In pursuit
of this goal, I spoke with four dermatologists (Figure (Figure1)1) and two estheticians. Here are their perspectives on how to keep your skin (and liver) in the best state possible.
The estheticians’ point of view
Given
that the skin is our largest organ and certainly the most visible one,
most of us would agree that taking care of it properly is important. In
fact, the skin-care industry estimated Americans alone spend over $43
billion per year (1)
on topical creams, cosmetic enhancements such as Botox, and spa
treatments (spending in this industry alone is over $12 billion; ref. 2).
To find out more about facials, I spoke with
two estheticians (neither of whom wanted to be named for this article)
at spas in New York City. I also spent some time reading esthetician
blogs and other skin-care articles on the Internet. According to the
estheticians consulted, a professional facial usually includes some
variation on these steps: a thorough cleansing of the skin; a skin
analysis by the facialist; exfoliation; extraction of blackheads,
clogged pores, and pimples if necessary; a facial massage; a treatment
mask; and the application of serums, moisturizers, and sunscreens.
Sometimes the facial includes a hand and arm massage, all in the pursuit
of both healthier skin and relaxation. In order to preserve youthful
skin (in women), they advised quarterly facials, beginning around the
age of 25.
One facialist I spoke to said that by getting
a proper analysis of your skin, you will learn your skin type so as to
properly address your skin’s needs. She claimed that most people are
using the wrong products for their skin type and that this causes the
skin to become sensitized. Online, I found an esthetician blog that was
quite emphatic about how a facialist is better placed than most to
recommend topical products and treatments, stating “estheticians have
available to them a wide variety of skin-care products that are
professional-only products and estheticians know how to use these
products properly. Without the training and knowledge of a licensed
esthetician, finding the right products for your skin can just be a
downright futile endeavor” (3).
This is a message I can certainly agree with — the cosmetics sections
of most department stores or even most drugstores have a dizzying array
of options, and the marketing and packaging can seduce even the most
logical of scientists. Splurging on the fancy packaging and boutique
skin care can feel wonderfully indulgent, which in and of itself can
have psychological benefits.
This is a point the estheticians came back to
again and again — the psychological impact a facial can have. They
claimed that the relaxing effect of the facial does nothing but benefit
your skin and your overall mental and physical health. One claimed, “The
stress of daily life shows up in your skin, so taking an hour to relax
and focus on yourself will help you physically and emotionally. Sure,
facials are a luxury because of the money and time spent, but think
about the fact that you have over an hour of protected time without your
cell phone ringing and your e-mail buzzing. There is no way to
underestimate the power of a little rest, relaxation, and rejuvenation.”
So
just how much can relaxation do from a scientific point of view? In my
experience, much of the relaxation comes from the massage component of a
facial. Again, from the blog, “Massage is a big part of a professional
facial. Massage will help you to relax and will also reduce the stress
hormone cortisol in your body. If cortisol is left to run amok in the
body, it will only hurt you over time, and additionally, massage
releases oxytocin, which is one of the body’s feel-good hormones” (3).
Unfortunately, the point about cortisol is not completely true — a
recent study showed that massage therapy’s effect on cortisol is
“generally very small and, in most cases, not statistically
distinguishable from zero” (4).
Nor is the point about oxytocin completely accurate: two studies point
to near minimal changes in oxytocin as a result of tactile stimulation (5, 6).
The estheticians I spoke to
and blogs I read went on to discuss other medical benefits to facials:
regulation of the immune system, detoxification, reduction in fluid
buildup, exfoliation, and lymphatic drainage. Antioxidant facials were
claimed to contain free-radical–fighting nutrients that would help
remove pollutants from the body (perhaps cleansing my liver?). High
frequency electrical currents were also touted as being effective as
part of a facial, with claims that they would enhance blood circulation,
increase collagen and elastin production, eliminate toxins and
bacteria, encourage lymphatic drainage, exfoliate dead skin cells, and
improve skin-care product absorption. I approached the bulk of these
claims with suspicion.
The dermatologists’ point of view
Given
my hesitation about the medical benefits of topical skin treatments, I
approached four dermatologists — three academic dermatologists (George
Cotsarelis, John R. Stanley, and Michael Detmar) and one Fifth Avenue
clinician (Adarsh Mudgil) in my neighborhood to answer some questions
about facials and skin care.
We began with a quick
primer on skin: just how deeply could a topically applied product
available from a spa penetrate the skin (Figure (Figure2)?2)?
Apparently, a typical ingredient in an effective skin-care product can
break up the dead stratum corneum cells and can cause a reactive
proliferation of the basal keratinocytes, but most creams do not
penetrate through the epidermis. Something like a protein won’t go
anywhere past the surface. All the dermatologists spoke at length about
retinoids, a class of chemical compounds that are related to vitamin A
that can actually pass further into the dermis, including into the blood
vessels, which then could have systemic effects. In fact, tretinoin
(also known as retinoic acid or Retin-A) is often used in the treatment
of dermatological conditions, from photoaging to acne and psoriasis (7).
Given the original impetus for writing this article, I
couldn’t help but ask the team of dermatologists if it was possible that
a product applied topically by a spa technician could cleanse my liver.
All replied with an emphatic no. Detmar in particular commented, “In
the concentrations available to spas, it is not really possible for a
compound to get to your liver to ‘cleanse’ it. I think that statement
belongs more to voodoo than to reality.” Two exceptions were mentioned:
steroids applied topically can enter the circulation and can suppress
the adrenal-pituitary axis, and carbon tetrachloride can also penetrate —
but that compound is toxic to the liver when put on the skin and would
be an unlikely component to a spa treatment. So, essentially, I could
end the article here: it is sadly impossible to cleanse the liver at a
spa, because as Stanley mentioned to me, “It is safe to assume that
anything being applied in a spa is unlikely to penetrate far enough to
enter the circulation and hence reach the liver, because if they were
applying things that entered the circulation, they would be considered
to be drugs and that would have to be regulated by the FDA.”
We
turned the conversation away from the liver and back to the face; I
asked them if there would ever be a case in which there would be a
medical benefit to getting a facial. The primary clinician in the group,
Mudgil, said, “I never recommend this to my patients. Whenever you have
darker pigmentation, and the facialist squeezes out whatever is there —
pimples and the like, they can do a lot more harm than good, in the
sense that you can end up with hyperpigmentation which can take months
to go away.” Cotsarelis added that there is no benefit for people with
normal skin — which is the greater part of the population. The only one
to disagree was Stanley, saying that a facial can achieve desquamation
of dead cells. “The stratum corneum flakes, and you could take off the
very superficial layer — if there is a little scaling, a facial can
remove that. And there are certain types of facials that a dermatologist
could do — with glycolic acid and that can cause inflammation, and with
inflammation you get a little temporary edema, and with edema in your
face, you look better because you see a transient improvement in fine
wrinkling.”
I quoted to these experts the online
estheticians’ claims about the major health benefits of regular facials:
regulation of the immune system, detoxification, reduction in fluid
buildup, stimulation of lymphatic drainage, exfoliation, and stress
relief. Stanley said they got it partly right, “I can certainly see how
getting a facial could aid in stress relief — and I guess you could say
that relaxation modulates the immune system, but a facial is not going
to have a direct effect on immune cells. And note that what we said
before is in direct opposition to what they’re saying: facials can cause
inflammation and then edema, and they’re saying that a facial causes
less fluid in the skin. If you have less fluid in your skin, you look
dry.”
On the point of fluid build up
and lymphatic drainage, two of the academics saw different sides. “I
don’t actually understand what is meant by ‘reduction in fluid buildup’
as pertains to the skin unless they mean edema from heart failure — but
your kidneys do that for you, not your skin,” said Cotsarelis. “And when
do you even have lymphatic drainage problems? If you do, you’re
certainly not going to get a facial to solve them. A normal person does
not have lymphatic problems on their face.” In contrast, Detmar says
there is a constant flow of lymphatic fluid in our skin. When fluid
leaks from blood vessels, it is taken up by the network of lymphatics:
that is the normal flushing system in our bodies. During aging,
especially if you have sun-damaged skin, then lymphatic function
deteriorates and you have fewer lymphatic vessels (8, 9).
He commented, “You might be able to make a case that you could reduce
fluid buildup by having a facial to encourage drainage when your skin
has fewer lymphatics. So promoting lymphatic flow can have benefits.
Whether or not this is achieved with a facial is a different story.”
The scientific study
I decided to conduct my own scientific study wherein I asked Dr. Mudgil
to assess my skin before and after a facial (though I did not tell him
what I was going to have done to my face) to determine whether there was
any noticeable difference. Mudgil noted, “You have the benefit of
having a fair bit of pigment in your skin, so your skin is very youthful
— you have the skin of a 20-something year old, even though I’d wager
that you are more likely to be in your mid to late 30s. It can be very
hard to tell with darker skinned Asians or Africans how old they are
based on their skin. Your skin is really perfectly normal, so I’m not
sure I’m going to be able to tell a difference at all in subsequent
visits of whether you’ve had anything done.”
On the advice of several beauty-conscious friends, I chose
a medi-spa run by a dermatologist in downtown Manhattan for a basic
facial. My facialist (one of the estheticians who did not want to be
named) claimed I had “a little bit of congestion in your T zone, and you
actually seem a bit dehydrated. I would say you have combination skin
where it is oily in your T zone and dry everywhere else. Your nose and
cheeks also have some sun damage.” She recommended that I start using an
exfoliator with beads or enzymes to help “brighten the skin and bring
new cells up.” She also advised me to use an eye cream, as “you’re a
little dry in that area. You have no major wrinkles, but you really want
to keep that area hydrated in order to prevent them from appearing.”
I
went back to see Dr. Mudgil the day after having the facial to see
whether he could ascertain what, if anything I had done to my face, but
he noted that whatever I had done was subtle. Given that I had some
subtle erythema between my brows, he postulated that I did something
that was exfoliative — something perhaps like a chemical peel. When I
revealed that I had just had a basic facial — and told him my
esthetician’s evaluation of my skin (combination skin), he agreed, but
said, “Essentially everyone has combination skin, and I would say you’re
on the very low end of that spectrum — your skin is extremely normal
all over. The area of the face with the greatest density of sebaceous
glands is in your T zone — your nose probably has the most.” When I
asked him whether he noted any sun damage on my nose and cheeks, he
disagreed with the esthetician’s assessment, saying, “Your skin is
amongst the least sun-damaged skin of any of my patients in your age
range. People with more pigment in their skin tend not to harbor as much
sun damage.” However, this pigmented skin has limits to its benefits.
Mudgil mentioned, “as much as your ethnicity can be a sun protectant,
you are going to be plagued by your genetics. Indians tend to have
deeper-set eyes and more discoloration under their eyes.” So, alas, the
esthetician’s tip to keep my under-eye area better hydrated may be in
vain.
My visit to Dr. Mudgil ended
with some tips: don’t get facials, as they can do more harm than good.
He recommended a daily facial moisturizer with an SPF 15 in it, even if
it is raining or snowing outside. He also added that I should wash my
face twice a day with mild multipurpose acne wash — even if I don’t have
acne. Then after I reach a certain threshold of “wisdom,” to use a
retinoid at night.
psychological effect from spending more,” noted Stanley.
“One of my female relatives buys according to the advertisements — she
says the products work better and sometimes if it costs more, she likes
it even better. Even if I tell her the items on the label aren’t making
it into her hair or her skin, she doesn’t care. So much of skin and hair
care is based on psychology.” Costarelis did have one addition to this
argument, though. He said that if a product comes from a big company,
the chance of having an adverse reaction is much smaller and the product
is more likely to work as advertised, as the bigger companies tend to
do more extensive testing before launching a product in the market. He
said, “The marketing branch of these companies is the one doing studies
on what is most effectively going to appeal to buyers — the marketing
can be really slick and can twist things in ways that aren’t completely
dishonest, but are fairly far from what the scientists actually showed.”
Regardless, he still recommends buying products from a brand name that
you know and have prior experience with. He went on to say, “When you
see some of the herbal tinctures and new brands pop up, you have no idea
what is actually in the products. Each batch is also probably quite
different.”
So what about products that are branded as
natural or organic — are they more effective or safer to apply to the
skin? “I think you’d be deceiving yourself a little bit there by
thinking that just because it is natural, it is going to be more
effective. There are caustic acids in lemons,” noted Cotsarelis. Stanley
went on to note that juice from limes can cause a photodermatitis that
is severe in people that have gin and tonics: “You see it all the time
in people drinking those by the pool. It can be a severe pigmentation
problem and can cause a bad reaction. And that is a natural product.
Natural doesn’t mean it’s not going to hurt you if you put it on your
skin. Poison ivy is a natural product, and you don’t rub that on your
skin.”
Last but not least, the ultimate goal for aging
females like me: I asked the panel whether there are any topical
treatments to reduce or prevent the appearance of fine lines and
wrinkles, and unsurprisingly, it all came back to retinoids. Mudgil
said, “A retinoid is very important to use, and there are formulations
that are not as drying that I use for my acne patients or even for my
Botox patients that want to maintain youthful skin.” Detmar noted the
oldest trick the cosmetic industry has: “You can very easily reduce the
appearance of wrinkles with the use of a moisturizer. Most of the
cosmetic treatments are variations on moisturizers; they immediately
reduce the appearance of fine lines by 15%–20%. Preventing their
appearance is a different issue. The daily use of retinoids can prevent
the appearance of wrinkles; they penetrate into the skin, can work on
the extracellular matrix — the collagen and elastin fibers.”
Final
lessons: use sunscreen, Vaseline, and retinoids; don’t bother with
facials; don’t rub poison ivy and citrus juices on your skin; and don’t
be seduced by fancy packaging and high prices. Easy enough!
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: The author has declared that no conflict of interest exists.
References
1.
Skin Care Industry News. News and Information about the Skin Care Industry. Skin Care Industry Web site.
http://skincareindustrynews.com
. Accessed December 16, 2011.
[Google Scholar]
2.
ISPA Releases 2009 U.S. Spa Industry Statistics. Hospitality Net Web site.
http://www.hospitalitynet.org/news/154000320/4042313.search?query=spa+industry+statistics
. Updated July 2, 2009. Accessed December 16, 2011.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Why You Should Get A Facial ASAP. Askanesthetician’s Blog Web site.
http://askanesthetician.wordpress.com/2010/05/12/why-you-should-get-a-facial-asap
. Updated May 12, 2010. Accessed December 16, 2011.
[Google Scholar]
4. Moyer CA, Seefeldt L, Mann ES, Jackley LM. Does massage therapy reduce cortisol? A comprehensive quantitative review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011;15(1):3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.06.001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Rapaport
MH, Schettler P, Bresee C. A preliminary study of the effects of a
single session of Swedish massage on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and
immune function in normal individuals. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16(10):1079–1088. doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0634. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Bello
D, White-Traut R, Schwertz D, Pournajafi-Nazarloo H, Carter CS. An
exploratory study of neurohormonal responses of healthy men to massage. J Altern Complement Med. 2008;14(4):387–394. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.0660. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Futoryan T, Gilchrest BA. Retinoids and the skin. Nutr Rev. 1994;52(9):299–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1994.tb01461.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Kajiya K, Detmar M. An important role of lymphatic vessels in the control of UVB-induced edema formation and inflammation. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126(4):919–921. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Kajiya K, Kunstfeld R, Detmar M, Chung JH. Reduction of lymphatic vessels in photodamaged human skin. J Dermatol Sci. 2007;47(3):241–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2007.05.003. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Articles from The Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation
No comments:
Post a Comment